-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 355
Open
Description
Would you consider formalizing the {root:uri} format as a PEP. I have found two use-cases where this would need a format PEP:
build-system.requiresfor inter-dependent projects such as withhatchlingandhatch. While this would not be able to be submitted to PyPI, it would still be useful for projects that are primarily distributed as git repos. We've added a similar parser forscikit-build-corebecause it can be very useful for compiled backends.dependency-groupsfor meta-projects. I have noticed that some usecases of the{roo:uri}is in meta-projects 1 to guarantee that a synchronized version of dependencies is installed. But this can leave artifacts of the meta-project'sdist-info, sodependency-groupsshould be a good alternative for it.
The issue in these cases though is that these are handled by the installers pip, uv etc. where hatchling logic cannot be injected, thus the proposal for formalizing this as a PEP.
Footnotes
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels