Stricter linting following #451

[jGaboardi]

• Stricter linting following Lint+turn on pre-commit for PRs -- [2026-04-25] #451
• will be opening several issue to link back to this for items that we should consider in the future.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 90.47619% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 82.3%. Comparing base (182d9f4) to head (630a4ee).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
esda/silhouettes.py	40.0%	3 Missing ⚠️
esda/crand.py	60.0%	2 Missing ⚠️
esda/topo.py	0.0%	2 Missing ⚠️
esda/mixture_smoothing.py	91.7%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #452   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   82.2%   82.3%           
=====================================
  Files         27      27           
  Lines       3965    3961    -4     
=====================================
- Hits        3260    3258    -2     
+ Misses       705     703    -2     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
esda/__init__.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
esda/adbscan.py	93.4% <100.0%> (ø)
esda/geary_local.py	87.0% <100.0%> (ø)
esda/geary_local_mv.py	98.9% <100.0%> (ø)
esda/getisord.py	70.6% <100.0%> (ø)
esda/join_counts.py	97.4% <100.0%> (ø)
esda/join_counts_local.py	98.2% <100.0%> (ø)
esda/join_counts_local_bv.py	98.8% <100.0%> (ø)
esda/join_counts_local_mv.py	98.2% <100.0%> (ø)
esda/lee.py	80.0% <100.0%> (ø)
... and 9 more

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[sjsrey]

Any chance this could be redirected against sjsrey:docs?
There are a lot of nb changes there that may lead to conflicts later on if we merge this into main, and then merge that?

[jGaboardi]

Any chance this could be redirected against sjsrey:docs? There are a lot of nb changes there that may lead to conflicts later on if we merge this into main, and then merge that?

I already massaged the PR from yesterday into sjsrey:docs after we merged (40a22f6) - so I was planning on doing the same for this PR after merging, which would be the same result as you suggest.