Skip to content

Fix timeit commands with backticks after command name#2415

Merged
ChrisLovering merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
timeit-backticks
Feb 26, 2023
Merged

Fix timeit commands with backticks after command name#2415
ChrisLovering merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
timeit-backticks

Conversation

@wookie184
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In theory the list of allowed commands shouldn't be necessary, but I'd prefer to keep it to make the functionality more robust.

@wookie184 wookie184 added a: backend Related to internal functionality and utilities (error_handler, logging, security, utils and core) a: utility Related to utility commands: (bot, eval, extensions, jams, reminders, snekbox, utils) t: enhancement Changes or improvements to existing features s: needs review Author is waiting for someone to review and approve labels Feb 25, 2023
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@shtlrs shtlrs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Didn't test this, but it doesn't look like the changes will break anything.
Other than that, LGTM !

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@brodycritchlow brodycritchlow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine to me, don't see anything that could break.

Comment thread tests/bot/exts/backend/test_error_handler.py
@ChrisLovering ChrisLovering merged commit 579969c into main Feb 26, 2023
@ChrisLovering ChrisLovering deleted the timeit-backticks branch February 26, 2023 14:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

a: backend Related to internal functionality and utilities (error_handler, logging, security, utils and core) a: utility Related to utility commands: (bot, eval, extensions, jams, reminders, snekbox, utils) s: needs review Author is waiting for someone to review and approve t: enhancement Changes or improvements to existing features

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants