docs(how-tos): add multiple version bootstrap guide#1152
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR adds documentation for the Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/how-tos/index.rst (1)
50-50: ⚡ Quick winAdd a Sphinx change directive for this user-facing index update.
The new guide entry is user-facing; add a nearby
.. versionchanged::(or.. versionadded::) note to keep docs change history consistent.As per coding guidelines, "
**/*.{rst,py}: Use Sphinxversionadded,versionremoved,versionchangeddirectives for user-facing changes".🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@docs/how-tos/index.rst` at line 50, Add a Sphinx version directive next to the new entry "multiple-version-bootstrap": insert a nearby ".. versionadded:: <version>" (or ".. versionchanged:: <version>") directive directly above or below the "multiple-version-bootstrap" line with a short one-line description of the user-facing change, using proper RST indentation and blank-line separation so the directive is associated with that entry.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@docs/how-tos/multiple-version-bootstrap.rst`:
- Around line 41-44: Shell will interpret the requirement specifier in the
examples as redirection; update the two examples that call "fromager bootstrap
--multiple-versions requests>=2.28" and "fromager bootstrap-parallel
--multiple-versions requests>=2.28" to wrap the requirement specifier in quotes
(e.g. "requests>=2.28") so the shell treats it as a single argument rather than
performing output redirection.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@docs/how-tos/index.rst`:
- Line 50: Add a Sphinx version directive next to the new entry
"multiple-version-bootstrap": insert a nearby ".. versionadded:: <version>" (or
".. versionchanged:: <version>") directive directly above or below the
"multiple-version-bootstrap" line with a short one-line description of the
user-facing change, using proper RST indentation and blank-line separation so
the directive is associated with that entry.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: ddda7291-d77d-40b6-a9ab-6809e88e98c7
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/how-tos/index.rstdocs/how-tos/multiple-version-bootstrap.rst
0aa5a7e to
e9ed2d0
Compare
eeb5434 to
8e9aad3
Compare
|
@mergify rebase |
Add a new how-to guide documenting the `--multiple-versions` flag for the `bootstrap` and `bootstrap-parallel` commands. Covers enabling the mode, how resolution and error handling work, flag interactions, and a complete example with verification steps. Co-Authored-By: Claude <claude@anthropic.com> Signed-off-by: Rohan Devasthale <rdevasth@redhat.com>
|
Deprecation notice: This pull request comes from a fork and was rebased using |
8e9aad3 to
08ee4ba
Compare
✅ Branch has been successfully rebased |
Add a new how-to guide documenting the
--multiple-versionsflag for thebootstrapandbootstrap-parallelcommands. Covers enabling the mode, how resolution and error handling work, flag interactions, and a complete example with verification steps.Closes: #1110