Remove the repr()-backticks

[collinwinter]

BPO	1500623
Nosy	@gvanrossum, @brettcannon
Files	py3k-remove_repr_backticks.patch: Remove support for backticks, against r46648.

^{Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.}

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = 'https://github.com/brettcannon'
closed_at = <Date 2008-01-06.22:29:46.565>
created_at = <Date 2006-06-04.20:54:02.000>
labels = ['interpreter-core']
title = 'Remove the repr()-backticks'
updated_at = <Date 2008-01-06.22:29:46.565>
user = 'https://bugs.python.org/collinwinter'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2008-01-06.22:29:46.565>
actor = 'admin'
assignee = 'brett.cannon'
closed = True
closed_date = None
closer = None
components = ['Interpreter Core']
creation = <Date 2006-06-04.20:54:02.000>
creator = 'collinwinter'
dependencies = []
files = ['7310']
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 1500623
keywords = ['patch']
message_count = 3.0
messages = ['50424', '50425', '50426']
nosy_count = 3.0
nosy_names = ['gvanrossum', 'brett.cannon', 'collinwinter']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'accepted'
stage = None
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = None
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue1500623'
versions = ['Python 3.0']

[collinwinter]

This patch removes parser support for backticks, the
UNARY_CONVERT opcode and all usages of the
repr()-backticks. It also adds a test to test_syntax to
make sure the backticks really are gone.

The patch is against r46648.

[gvanrossum]

Logged In: YES
user_id=6380

For Brett to check that he's done all that this patch does
already, and then to close.

[brettcannon]

Logged In: YES
user_id=357491

OK, Collin caught one thing I didn't. All fixed now.