Skip to content

[3.7] bpo-35193: Fix an off by one error in the RETURN_VALUE case. (GH-10418)#10421

Merged
miss-islington merged 1 commit intopython:3.7from
miss-islington:backport-49fa4a9-3.7
Nov 9, 2018
Merged

[3.7] bpo-35193: Fix an off by one error in the RETURN_VALUE case. (GH-10418)#10421
miss-islington merged 1 commit intopython:3.7from
miss-islington:backport-49fa4a9-3.7

Conversation

@miss-islington
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Nov 9, 2018

Fix an off by one error in the peephole optimizer when checking for unreachable code beyond a return.

Do a bounds check within find_op so it can return before going past the end as a safety measure.

7db3c488335168993689ddae5914a28e16188447GH-diff-a33329ae6ae0bb295d742f0caf93c137
introduced this off by one error while fixing another one nearby.

This bug was shipped in all Python 3.6 and 3.7 releases.

The included unittest won't fail unless you do a clang msan build.
(cherry picked from commit 49fa4a9)

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith greg@krypto.org

https://bugs.python.org/issue35193

…H-10418)

Fix an off by one error in the peephole optimizer when checking for unreachable code beyond a return.

Do a bounds check within find_op so it can return before going past the end as a safety measure.

python@7db3c488335168993689ddae5914a28e16188447GH-diff-a33329ae6ae0bb295d742f0caf93c137
introduced this off by one error while fixing another one nearby.

This bug was shipped in all Python 3.6 and 3.7 releases.

The included unittest won't fail unless you do a clang msan build.
(cherry picked from commit 49fa4a9)

Co-authored-by: Gregory P. Smith <greg@krypto.org>
@miss-islington
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@gpshead: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit f16ebcd into python:3.7 Nov 9, 2018
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-49fa4a9-3.7 branch November 9, 2018 02:13
@miss-islington
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@gpshead: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type-bug An unexpected behavior, bug, or error

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants