gh-88574: Skip a spurious blank line after a literal in imaplib#152751
Open
serhiy-storchaka wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
gh-88574: Skip a spurious blank line after a literal in imaplib#152751serhiy-storchaka wants to merge 1 commit into
serhiy-storchaka wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Some IMAP servers send an extra blank line after the data of a literal. imaplib mistook it for the response trailer and failed on the next command. Such a blank line is now skipped. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
serhiy-storchaka
added
needs backport to 3.13
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some IMAP servers send an extra blank line after the counted data of a
literal.
imaplibmistook that blank line for the response trailer,lost track of the real continuation, and aborted with an "unexpected
response" error on the next command. Such a blank line is now skipped.
This revives the fix from the closed PR #26701, adding the regression
test it lacked.