Simplify creation of the __new__ method in namedtuple()#20361
Merged
rhettinger merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom May 26, 2020
Merged
Simplify creation of the __new__ method in namedtuple()#20361rhettinger merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom
rhettinger merged 1 commit intopython:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thanks @rhettinger for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2020
(cherry picked from commit 3cfe5b7) Co-authored-by: Raymond Hettinger <rhettinger@users.noreply.github.com>
|
GH-20409 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch. |
rhettinger
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 26, 2020
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Minor code simplification. Using exec() is slower and more awkward than eval() in this context.