Skip to content

[docs] Change the InlineTypedDict example #20172

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2025
+4 −4
Merged

[docs] Change the InlineTypedDict example #20172

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions docs/source/command_line.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1211,8 +1211,8 @@ List of currently incomplete/experimental features:

.. code-block:: python

def test_values() -> {"int": int, "str": str}:
return {"int": 42, "str": "test"}
def test_values() -> {"width": int, "description": str}:
return {"width": 42, "description": "test"}


Miscellaneous
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions docs/source/typed_dict.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -303,8 +303,8 @@ to use inline TypedDict syntax. For example:

.. code-block:: python

def test_values() -> {"int": int, "str": str}:
return {"int": 42, "str": "test"}
def test_values() -> {"width": int, "description": str}:
return {"width": 42, "description": "test"}

class Response(TypedDict):
status: int
Expand Down