Skip to content

Conversation

@hugovk
Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk commented Nov 24, 2025

Description

  • Sort the downloads table, with new x.y.z versions at the top, instead of sorting by date.

From the issue:

(Maybe split into multiple tables by (major, minor) to avoid having to scroll through 3.13.1-9 before you see 3.12?)

I considered this, but decided against it -- the first table now has download links for the latest version of each 3.x feature release (#2816).

Before:

(Note this is with local test data)

image

After:

image

Closes

@hugovk hugovk added enhancement This is an improvement to existing code or configuration app/downloads Relates to the downloads app labels Nov 24, 2025
@gvanrossum
Copy link
Member

Curious why the new "Looking for a specific release?" table lists only 3.10 releases. Are there no bugfix releases of 3.11, 3.12 or 3.13?

@hugovk
Copy link
Member Author

hugovk commented Nov 24, 2025

It's a screenshot from a local server on my machine, and it comes with an old test database that only goes up to 3.10.

There are bugfix releases for 3.11-3.13 in the production database, and they'll show up after merge.

Copy link
Member

@gvanrossum gvanrossum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure it matters, and I don't know this code base, but LGTM anyway!

@JacobCoffee JacobCoffee merged commit d19b30f into python:main Nov 25, 2025
3 checks passed
@hugovk hugovk deleted the sort-by-version branch November 25, 2025 09:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

app/downloads Relates to the downloads app enhancement This is an improvement to existing code or configuration

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sort downloads table by version number, not release date

4 participants