-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
stubsabot: add project links #8158
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have never understood these instructions. Why not just fix the PR by pushing commits directly to it, and merge when stubtest passes again?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that seems to be the more common rhythm we're settling into.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a good question. It's because of what the current code will do if we run it automatically on a regular basis (rather than me running it manually in batches). stubsabot.py just makes a commit off of master and pushes it. master changes regularly, so these pushes would fail. Rather than failing, silently doing nothing, or some more complicated logic that checks what's on the remote, it currently force pushes to the remote:
typeshed/scripts/stubsabot.py
Line 283 in a9fb8c5
So this means it could undo changes we made.
But thinking about it a little bit more, silently doing nothing might not be that bad an option?
The other reason for these instructions is in theory non-maintainers could contribute (and they might benefit from instructions more so than maintainers).