Introduction to packages#72
Conversation
|
Hey @wg150, It seems to me that as things stand, this is covering #15 more than #14. Are you still going to add the non-custom packages stuff. In my head, Anyway some comments on what we have here:
|
|
Thanks for the comments @arm61
Yeah I think you're right, would it be worth combining #14 and #15 into one section or is it best to keep them separate? For the non-custom stuff: I have written a section on custom modules but do you mean covering packages not available on
Good point, I can move things around so that these are introduced at the start. Also, is it worth covering Conda? |
|
I think keeping things separate makes more sense, I think that small accessible sections makes for easier reading. However, I do think that #15 should follow directly on from #14. #14 should cover installing and importing common packages (numpy, scipy, etc.) while #15 is you have written a My only worry with covering conda is that is muddies the water a bit, there is probably benefit to saying "pip is the most common way to install packages, however other methods such as conda exist" then link out to some documentation on conda. I am happy to have my mind changed on that though! |
|
Ok that sounds good to me, I've now pretty much covered #15 in this PR so I'll just make a new PR for that and change the content for this one addressing #14 (sorry for the confusion). I agree about Conda, I think a short sentence or two to make the reader aware and pointing them to resources etc would be best. |
|
Comments:
|
|
@arm61 thanks, here's what I've done:
I think it's almost ready now, let me know what you think. |
|
Incidentally I hardly use |
|
I don't think I have ever |
|
I will merge now, looks good! |
Makes a start on a general introduction to python packages and modules, addressing #14. Currently in good practice section but could be moved to basics.