Skip to content

Add wagtail#13

Closed
marcoacierno wants to merge 11 commits intomasterfrom
feature/wagtail
Closed

Add wagtail#13
marcoacierno wants to merge 11 commits intomasterfrom
feature/wagtail

Conversation

@marcoacierno
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@marcoacierno marcoacierno changed the title Add wagtail [WIP] Add wagtail Jul 16, 2017
@patrick91 patrick91 changed the title [WIP] Add wagtail WIP: Add wagtail Jul 16, 2017
@patrick91 patrick91 requested review from patrick91 and simobasso July 16, 2017 15:10
Comment thread backend/requirements/base.txt Outdated
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
Django==1.11
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why the downgrade of django?

ref wagtail/wagtail#3579

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The version of wagtail I used when I started the integration wasn't compatible with django 1.11 yet

Comment thread backend/pycon/urls.py

from wagtail.wagtailadmin import urls as wagtailadmin_urls
from wagtail.wagtailcore import urls as wagtail_urls
from wagtail.wagtaildocs import urls as wagtaildocs_urls
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please squash in 36af1bc

Comment thread backend/requirements/base.txt Outdated
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
Django==1.10.7
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please squash in 36af1bc

@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ Django==1.11.3
wagtail==1.11.1
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please move this deps in production' dependencies

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@marcoacierno marcoacierno Jul 25, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you talking about 'psycopg2==2.7.1' and not wagtail?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd just use postgres everywhere :)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

'cause the actually default is sqlite.

If a collaborator w/o pg start an instances with that commit, the setup will fail.

options:

  1. move psycopg2==2.7.1 in production' dependencies
  2. use pg as default in settings_base.py

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's use postgres everywhere :)

@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
MEDIA_URL = '/media/'
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please squash in 36af1bc

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please squash in fb6e1eb

@marcoacierno marcoacierno force-pushed the feature/wagtail branch 2 times, most recently from e5536c3 to 476d4ca Compare July 23, 2017 21:52
@marcoacierno marcoacierno changed the title WIP: Add wagtail Add wagtail Jul 23, 2017
@marcoacierno marcoacierno deleted the feature/wagtail branch April 27, 2019 19:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants