Deserialize to named data store output #15469
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Should this be a public API? May be relatively easy for user to impl with the existing deserialize functionality. Differential Revision: [D83510300](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D83510300/) [ghstack-poisoned]
lucylq
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
Should this be a public API? May be relatively easy for user to impl with the existing deserialize functionality. Differential Revision: [D83510300](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D83510300/) ghstack-source-id: 312879155 Pull Request resolved: #15469
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/15469
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ No FailuresAs of commit 4596575 with merge base c85ece4 ( This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
meta-cla
bot
added
the
CLA Signed
This PR needs a
|
JacobSzwejbka
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2025
Should this be a public API? May be relatively easy for user to impl with the existing deserialize functionality. Differential Revision: [D83510300](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D83510300/) [ghstack-poisoned]
lucylq
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
Pull Request resolved: #15469 Relatively easy for user to impl with the existing deserialize functionality, but think it's good to have something explicit too. Differential Revision: [D83510300](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D83510300/) ghstack-source-id: 319841977
Should this be a public API? May be relatively easy for user to impl with the existing deserialize functionality. Differential Revision: [D83510300](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D83510300/) [ghstack-poisoned]
lucylq
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
Pull Request resolved: #15469 Relatively easy for user to impl with the existing deserialize functionality, but think it's good to have something explicit too. ghstack-source-id: 319841977 Differential Revision: [D83510300](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D83510300/)
Should this be a public API? May be relatively easy for user to impl with the existing deserialize functionality. Differential Revision: [D83510300](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D83510300/) [ghstack-poisoned]
lucylq
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
Pull Request resolved: #15469 Relatively easy for user to impl with the existing deserialize functionality, but think it's good to have something explicit too. ghstack-source-id: 319896032 Differential Revision: [D83510300](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D83510300/)
meta-codesync
bot
merged commit bc6499c
into
gh/lucylq/122/base
239 of 241 checks passed
lucylq
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2025
This PR was created by the merge bot to help merge the original PR into the main branch. ghstack PR number: #15469 by @lucylq ^ Please use this as the source of truth for the PR details, comments, and reviews ghstack PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/lucylq/122/base ghstack PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/lucylq/122/head Merge bot PR base: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/main Merge bot PR head: https://github.com/pytorch/executorch/tree/gh/lucylq/122/orig Differential Revision: [D83510300](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D83510300/) @diff-train-skip-merge Co-authored-by: lucylq <lfq@meta.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):
Should this be a public API? May be relatively easy for user to impl with the existing deserialize functionality.
Differential Revision: D83510300