Skip to content

Fix operator precedence bug in cat_out dtype check#18596

Merged
meta-codesync[bot] merged 1 commit intopytorch:mainfrom
abeakkas:export-D98801435
Mar 31, 2026
Merged

Fix operator precedence bug in cat_out dtype check#18596
meta-codesync[bot] merged 1 commit intopytorch:mainfrom
abeakkas:export-D98801435

Conversation

@abeakkas
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary: The && operator binds tighter than || in C++, so the optimized flag only gated ScalarType::Int. For all other types (Short, Char, Float, etc.), xa_nn_cat was called unconditionally — even when inputs had mixed dtypes — resulting in raw byte copies without type conversion.

Differential Revision: D98801435

Summary: The `&&` operator binds tighter than `||` in C++, so the `optimized` flag only gated ScalarType::Int. For all other types (Short, Char, Float, etc.), xa_nn_cat was called unconditionally — even when inputs had mixed dtypes — resulting in raw byte copies without type conversion.

Differential Revision: D98801435
@pytorch-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

pytorch-bot Bot commented Mar 30, 2026

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/18596

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (2 Unrelated Failures)

As of commit e0c1c59 with merge base 4c56d9b (image):

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@meta-cla meta-cla Bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Mar 30, 2026
@meta-codesync
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

meta-codesync Bot commented Mar 30, 2026

@abeakkas has exported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view the originating Diff in D98801435.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR needs a release notes: label

If your change should be included in the release notes (i.e. would users of this library care about this change?), please use a label starting with release notes:. This helps us keep track and include your important work in the next release notes.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "release notes: none"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@aliafzal aliafzal self-requested a review March 31, 2026 00:34
@meta-codesync meta-codesync Bot merged commit 573f930 into pytorch:main Mar 31, 2026
266 of 275 checks passed
Jiseong-oh pushed a commit to Jiseong-oh/executorch that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2026
Differential Revision: D98801435

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#18596
Jiseong-oh pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2026
Differential Revision: D98801435

Pull Request resolved: #18596
Jiseong-oh pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2026
Differential Revision: D98801435

Pull Request resolved: #18596
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. fb-exported meta-exported

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants