Skip to content

Conversation

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #8419

[ghstack-poisoned]
@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

swolchok commented Feb 14, 2025

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Feb 14, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/8493

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 New Failures

As of commit 053b6ce with merge base b5c0c61 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Feb 14, 2025
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
Fixes #8419

ghstack-source-id: f62e666
ghstack-comment-id: 2658182008
Pull Request resolved: #8493
@swolchok swolchok added the release notes: build Changes related to build, including dependency upgrades, build flags, optimizations, etc. label Feb 14, 2025
if [[ "$BUILD_TOOL" == "cmake" ]]; then
.ci/scripts/unittest-linux-cmake.sh
elif [[ "$BUILD_TOOL" == "buck2" ]]; then
.ci/scripts/unittest-linux-buck2.sh
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file doesn't exist

[ghstack-poisoned]
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2025
Fixes #8419

ghstack-source-id: 36e19d1
ghstack-comment-id: 2658182008
Pull Request resolved: #8493
[ghstack-poisoned]
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2025
Fixes #8419

ghstack-source-id: 065f8c3
ghstack-comment-id: 2658182008
Pull Request resolved: #8493
[ghstack-poisoned]
swolchok added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2025
Fixes #8419

ghstack-source-id: 483f2bf
ghstack-comment-id: 2658182008
Pull Request resolved: #8493
@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

CI looks good, just waiting for review

.ci/scripts/setup-macos.sh cmake

# Install llama3_2_vision dependencies.
PYTHON_EXECUTABLE=python ./examples/models/llama3_2_vision/install_requirements.sh
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

python ${CONDA_RUN}...?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the conda run is right there on line 29, and the code comes directly from _unittest.yml

Copy link
Contributor

@mergennachin mergennachin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unittest / macos / macos-job (pull_request) is still failing. looks like you need to run the examples/install_requirements.sh within the conda environment?

@swolchok
Copy link
Contributor Author

swolchok commented Feb 19, 2025

unittest / macos / macos-job (pull_request) is still failing

this job has been broken for at least the past day. If you look at the logs, you can see we are running tests, it's just that the tests are failing

@swolchok swolchok merged commit e2485c9 into main Feb 19, 2025
76 of 78 checks passed
@swolchok swolchok deleted the gh/swolchok/265/head branch February 19, 2025 17:31
kedarnath03 pushed a commit to kedarnath03/executorch that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2025
Fixes #8419

ghstack-source-id: 483f2bf
ghstack-comment-id: 2658182008
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/executorch#8493
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. release notes: build Changes related to build, including dependency upgrades, build flags, optimizations, etc.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

we should have a CI job that requires that the tree is buildable with buck

4 participants