-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
Fixe some typos #105869
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixe some typos #105869
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/105869
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 New Failure, 1 Unrelated FailureAs of commit 6c6004b: NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:
UNSTABLE - The following job failed but was likely due to flakiness present on trunk and has been marked as unstable:
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
torch/nn/modules/activation.py
Outdated
return x.device.type in ["cpu", "cuda", torch.utils.backend_registration._privateuse1_backend_name] | ||
|
||
return False | ||
return x.device.type in ["cpu", "cuda", torch.utils.backend_registration._privateuse1_backend_name] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, it seems like this was done on purpose see
#95653 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cancelling the merge since this was done purposefully
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I reverted python code fixes and left only typos fixes
The merge job was canceled. If you believe this is a mistake,then you can re trigger it through pytorch-bot. |
88743e5
to
0d84a7e
Compare
@pytorchbot merge |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are: Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud |
@pytorchbot merge -r |
@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict. Check the current status here |
Successfully rebased |
Merge startedYour change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Merge failedReason: Not merging any PRs at the moment because there is a merge blocking https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/labels/ci:%20sev issue open at: Details for Dev Infra teamRaised by workflow job |
@pytorchbot merge -f "unrelated failures" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
Description: