Skip to content

Conversation

ekamiti
Copy link
Contributor

@ekamiti ekamiti commented Aug 16, 2023

Fixes #107335. The skips were updated for the _ref ops to match those for eager mode where necessary. Part of breakdown of #104489.

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 16, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/107338

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

✅ No Failures

As of commit 3424d65 with merge base 2d7a062 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@ekamiti ekamiti changed the title Update reduciton_ops groupings to include primtorch types Update reduction_ops groupings to include primtorch types Aug 17, 2023
@ekamiti ekamiti marked this pull request as ready for review August 18, 2023 00:59
@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

ezyang commented Aug 18, 2023

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Aug 18, 2023
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: This PR needs a release notes: label
If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

To add a label, you can comment to pytorchbot, for example
@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

For more information, see
https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@ezyang ezyang added the topic: not user facing topic category label Aug 18, 2023
@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

ezyang commented Aug 18, 2023

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: New commits were pushed while merging. Please rerun the merge command.

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

@ekamiti
Copy link
Contributor Author

ekamiti commented Aug 18, 2023

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit to wenzhe-nrv/pytorch that referenced this pull request Aug 19, 2023
…7338)

Fixes pytorch#107335. The skips were updated for the _ref ops to match those for eager mode where necessary. Part of breakdown of pytorch#104489.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#107338
Approved by: https://github.com/ezyang
@ekamiti ekamiti deleted the reduction_ops branch August 24, 2023 00:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged open source topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update generic operator tests to run for primtorch ops

4 participants