Skip to content

Conversation

bobrenjc93
Copy link
Contributor

@bobrenjc93 bobrenjc93 commented Jan 6, 2025

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jan 6, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/144263

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 1 New Failure, 81 Pending

As of commit e78e574 with merge base 9f09b71 (image):

NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@bobrenjc93
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot rebase -b main

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/main. Check the current status here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Rebase failed due to Command git -C /home/runner/work/pytorch/pytorch rebase refs/remotes/origin/main gh/bobrenjc93/234/orig returned non-zero exit code 1

Rebasing (1/1)
Auto-merging torch/_functorch/_aot_autograd/autograd_cache.py
Auto-merging torch/_functorch/_aot_autograd/runtime_wrappers.py
Auto-merging torch/_functorch/_aot_autograd/subclass_parametrization.py
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in torch/_functorch/_aot_autograd/subclass_parametrization.py
Auto-merging torch/_functorch/_aot_autograd/subclass_utils.py
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in torch/_functorch/_aot_autograd/subclass_utils.py
Auto-merging torch/_functorch/aot_autograd.py
Auto-merging torch/_functorch/functional_call.py
error: could not apply f614d34132b... Migrate from Tuple -> tuple in torch/_functorch
hint: Resolve all conflicts manually, mark them as resolved with
hint: "git add/rm <conflicted_files>", then run "git rebase --continue".
hint: You can instead skip this commit: run "git rebase --skip".
hint: To abort and get back to the state before "git rebase", run "git rebase --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Could not apply f614d34132b... Migrate from Tuple -> tuple in torch/_functorch

Raised by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/12699549820

[ghstack-poisoned]
@bobrenjc93
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Jan 10, 2025
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are:

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

[ghstack-poisoned]
bobrenjc93 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2025
    ghstack-source-id: 0a85dea
    Pull Request resolved: #144263
ghstack-source-id: d19d5da
@bobrenjc93
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are:

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

@bobrenjc93
Copy link
Contributor Author

There's a similar blast radius on this one.

@bobrenjc93 bobrenjc93 closed this Jan 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/bobrenjc93/234/head branch February 12, 2025 02:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants