Skip to content

Conversation

@ColinPeppler
Copy link
Contributor

@ColinPeppler ColinPeppler commented Apr 15, 2025

Summary: empty uses uninitialized values so that could be NaNs, thus, the assert_close kept failing in FBCode.

Differential Revision: D73067722

cc @voznesenskym @penguinwu @EikanWang @jgong5 @Guobing-Chen @XiaobingSuper @zhuhaozhe @blzheng @wenzhe-nrv @jiayisunx @ipiszy @chenyang78 @kadeng @muchulee8 @amjames @chauhang @aakhundov

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 15, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/151363

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

⏳ No Failures, 2 Pending

As of commit 552de5d with merge base 331423e (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73067722

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73067722

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#151363

`empty` uses uninitialized values so that could be NaNs, thus, the assert_close kept failing in FBCode.

Test Plan:
```
buck test 'fbcode//mode/opt' fbcode//caffe2/test/inductor:unbacked_symints_cpu -- --exact 'caffe2/test/inductor:unbacked_symints_cpu - test_einsum_cpu (caffe2.test.inductor.test_unbacked_symints.TestUnbackedSymintsCPU)' --env TORCH_LOGS="+output_code" --print-passing-details --env TORCH_LOGS_FORMAT="%(filename)s:%(lineno)s: %(message)s"
```

Reviewed By: YUNQIUGUO

Differential Revision: D73067722
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73067722

@Camyll
Copy link
Contributor

Camyll commented Apr 15, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 15, 2025

This PR needs to be approved by an authorized maintainer before merge.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Apr 15, 2025
@Camyll
Copy link
Contributor

Camyll commented Apr 15, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

The merge job was canceled or timed out. This most often happen if two merge requests were issued for the same PR, or if merge job was waiting for more than 6 hours for tests to finish. In later case, please do not hesitate to reissue the merge command
For more information see pytorch-bot wiki.

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged while ignoring the following 0 checks:

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@Camyll
Copy link
Contributor

Camyll commented Apr 16, 2025

@pytorchbot merge -f

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 16, 2025

❌ 🤖 pytorchbot command failed:

@pytorchbot merge: error: argument -f/--force: expected one argument

usage: @pytorchbot merge [-f MESSAGE | -i] [-ic] [-r [{viable/strict,main}]]

Try @pytorchbot --help for more info.

@Camyll
Copy link
Contributor

Camyll commented Apr 16, 2025

@pytorchbot merge -f "to land forward fix"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

The merge job was canceled or timed out. This most often happen if two merge requests were issued for the same PR, or if merge job was waiting for more than 6 hours for tests to finish. In later case, please do not hesitate to reissue the merge command
For more information see pytorch-bot wiki.

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Please use -f as last resort and instead consider -i/--ignore-current to continue the merge ignoring current failures. This will allow currently pending tests to finish and report signal before the merge.

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

timocafe pushed a commit to timocafe/pytorch that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2025
Summary: `empty` uses uninitialized values so that could be NaNs, thus, the assert_close kept failing in FBCode.

Test Plan:
```
buck test 'fbcode//mode/opt' fbcode//caffe2/test/inductor:unbacked_symints_cpu -- --exact 'caffe2/test/inductor:unbacked_symints_cpu - test_einsum_cpu (caffe2.test.inductor.test_unbacked_symints.TestUnbackedSymintsCPU)' --env TORCH_LOGS="+output_code" --print-passing-details --env TORCH_LOGS_FORMAT="%(filename)s:%(lineno)s: %(message)s"
```

Differential Revision: D73067722

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#151363
Approved by: https://github.com/Camyll

Co-authored-by: Camyll Harajli <camyllh@meta.com>
amathewc pushed a commit to amathewc/pytorch that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
Summary: `empty` uses uninitialized values so that could be NaNs, thus, the assert_close kept failing in FBCode.

Test Plan:
```
buck test 'fbcode//mode/opt' fbcode//caffe2/test/inductor:unbacked_symints_cpu -- --exact 'caffe2/test/inductor:unbacked_symints_cpu - test_einsum_cpu (caffe2.test.inductor.test_unbacked_symints.TestUnbackedSymintsCPU)' --env TORCH_LOGS="+output_code" --print-passing-details --env TORCH_LOGS_FORMAT="%(filename)s:%(lineno)s: %(message)s"
```

Differential Revision: D73067722

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#151363
Approved by: https://github.com/Camyll

Co-authored-by: Camyll Harajli <camyllh@meta.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants