Skip to content

Conversation

kkolur76
Copy link
Contributor

Summary: We should use the pypi version.

Test Plan: CI

Differential Revision: D73211869

Summary: We should use the pypi version.

Test Plan: CI

Differential Revision: D73211869
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 18, 2025

This appears to be a diff that was exported from phabricator, but the PR author does not have sufficient permissions to run CI. @kkolur76, please do step 2 of internal wiki to get write access so you do not need to get CI approvals in the future. If you think this is a mistake, please contact the Pytorch Dev Infra team.

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 18, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/151668

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 0e29c4f with merge base 776aa68 (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D73211869

@kkolur76
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot label "topic: not user facing"

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the topic: not user facing topic category label Apr 18, 2025
@kkolur76
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Skylion007 can you grant me access to push to this branch please?

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge -i

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged, merging with -i because oss signals were bypassed internally)

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 22, 2025

Pull workflow has not been scheduled for the PR yet. It could be because author doesn't have permissions to run those or skip-checks keywords were added to PR/commits, aborting merge. Please get/give approval for the workflows and/or remove skip ci decorators before next merge attempt. If you think this is a mistake, please contact PyTorch Dev Infra.

@wdvr
Copy link
Contributor

wdvr commented Apr 22, 2025

@pytorchbot merge

(already landed internally - starting test now)

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Apr 22, 2025
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request fb-exported Merged topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants