Skip to content

Conversation

janeyx99
Copy link
Contributor

@janeyx99 janeyx99 commented Jun 25, 2025

Instead of skipping the whole test as the CUPTI team figures out what is wrong, let's temporarily skip the profiler check portion. It is high pri to add it back to ensure foreach ops are actually performant.

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jun 25, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/156871

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)

As of commit 92fbe33 with merge base 070aa59 (image):

UNSTABLE - The following job is marked as unstable, possibly due to flakiness on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

… portion"

Instead of skipping the whole test as the CUPTI team figures out what is wrong, let's temporarily skip the profiler check portion. It is high pri to add it back to ensure foreach ops are actually performant.




[ghstack-poisoned]
assert mta_called == (expect_fastpath and (not zero_size)), (
f"{mta_called=}, {expect_fastpath=}, {zero_size=}, {self.func.__name__=}, {keys=}"
)
# Skip profiler check for CUDA 12.6, 12.8 as the upgrade makes profiler results flaky
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you comment out the whole block? No need to run the profiler at all here?

… portion"

Instead of skipping the whole test as the CUPTI team figures out what is wrong, let's temporarily skip the profiler check portion. It is high pri to add it back to ensure foreach ops are actually performant.




[ghstack-poisoned]
Copy link
Collaborator

@albanD albanD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Starting merge as part of PR stack under #156872

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2025
See #156261 (comment)

Testing is a valid q--it is pretty expensive to test such large tensors for all these ops.

Pull Request resolved: #156872
Approved by: https://github.com/Skylion007, https://github.com/eqy
ghstack dependencies: #156876, #156871
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the gh/janeyx99/272/head branch July 28, 2025 02:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants