Skip to content

Conversation

@laithsakka
Copy link
Contributor

@laithsakka laithsakka commented Oct 28, 2025

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 28, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/166379

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

laithsakka added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 17171a7
Pull Request resolved: #166379
@laithsakka laithsakka reopened this Oct 29, 2025
@laithsakka laithsakka marked this pull request as ready for review October 29, 2025 01:13
laithsakka added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2025
ghstack-source-id: f076cad
Pull Request resolved: #166379
Copy link
Contributor

@Lucaskabela Lucaskabela left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change seems to have caused some odd test failures related to formatting, but otherwise the content looks good. Requesting changes for viz on the test failures

laithsakka added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 90f7ed5
Pull Request resolved: #166379
laithsakka added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 70361c4
Pull Request resolved: #166379
@laithsakka laithsakka marked this pull request as draft October 29, 2025 16:42
laithsakka added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 90486a7
Pull Request resolved: #166379
@laithsakka
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 31, 2025
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 jobs have failed, first few of them are: trunk / macos-py3-arm64 / test (default, 1, 3, macos-m1-stable)

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

laithsakka added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2025
ghstack-source-id: ffc2337
Pull Request resolved: #166379
laithsakka added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 82fddc6
Pull Request resolved: #166379
@laithsakka
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@malfet
Copy link
Contributor

malfet commented Nov 5, 2025

@pytorchbot revert -m "Need to revert previous PR in the stack" -c weird

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2025
This reverts commit d7e2d0a.

Reverted #166379 on behalf of https://github.com/malfet due to Need to revert previous PR in the stack ([comment](#166379 (comment)))
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@laithsakka your PR has been successfully reverted.

@pytorchmergebot pytorchmergebot added Reverted ci-no-td Do not run TD on this PR labels Nov 5, 2025
laithsakka added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2025
ghstack-source-id: 7f300fe
Pull Request resolved: #166379
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci-no-td Do not run TD on this PR ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged Reverted topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants