-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 25.7k
[DataPipe] moving mux IterDataPipe test to the right location #66277
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
[ghstack-poisoned]
CI Flow Status⚛️ CI FlowRuleset - Version:
You can add a comment to the PR and tag @pytorchbot with the following commands: # ciflow rerun, "ciflow/default" will always be added automatically
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun
# ciflow rerun with additional labels "-l <ciflow/label_name>", which is equivalent to adding these labels manually and trigger the rerun
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun -l ciflow/scheduled -l ciflow/slowFor more information, please take a look at the CI Flow Wiki. |
🔗 Helpful links
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 1b31a6e (more details on the Dr. CI page): 💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚 This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great Catch! Thanks
…ion" Previously, it is grouped together with tests related to `MapDataPipe`, but it should be with `IterDataPipe`. cc @VitalyFedyunin ejguan @NivekT [ghstack-poisoned]
|
@NivekT has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
Stack from ghstack:
Previously, it is grouped together with tests related to
MapDataPipe, but it should be withIterDataPipe.cc @VitalyFedyunin @ejguan @NivekT
Differential Revision: D31485823