Skip to content

Conversation

@NivekT
Copy link
Contributor

@NivekT NivekT commented Oct 7, 2021

Stack from ghstack:

Previously, it is grouped together with tests related to MapDataPipe, but it should be with IterDataPipe.

cc @VitalyFedyunin @ejguan @NivekT

Differential Revision: D31485823

@pytorch-probot
Copy link

pytorch-probot bot commented Oct 7, 2021

CI Flow Status

⚛️ CI Flow

Ruleset - Version: v1
Ruleset - File: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/1b31a6e6d2f55c825a87ddee6a979401e49c81ea/.github/generated-ciflow-ruleset.json
PR ciflow labels: ciflow/default

Workflows Labels (bold enabled) Status
Triggered Workflows
linux-bionic-py3.6-clang9 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/noarch, ciflow/xla ✅ triggered
linux-vulkan-bionic-py3.6-clang9 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/vulkan ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-cuda11.3-py3.6-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.6-clang7-asan ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/sanitizers ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.6-clang7-onnx ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/onnx ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.6-gcc5.4 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.6-gcc7-bazel-test ciflow/all, ciflow/bazel, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux ✅ triggered
periodic-pytorch-linux-xenial-cuda10.2-cudnn7-py3-gcc7-slow-gradcheck ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/slow, ciflow/slow-gradcheck ✅ triggered
win-vs2019-cpu-py3 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/win ✅ triggered
win-vs2019-cuda11.3-py3 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/default, ciflow/win ✅ triggered
Skipped Workflows
libtorch-linux-xenial-cuda10.2-py3.6-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/libtorch, ciflow/linux 🚫 skipped
libtorch-linux-xenial-cuda11.3-py3.6-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/libtorch, ciflow/linux 🚫 skipped
linux-bionic-cuda10.2-py3.9-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/linux, ciflow/slow 🚫 skipped
linux-xenial-cuda10.2-py3.6-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/linux, ciflow/slow 🚫 skipped
parallelnative-linux-xenial-py3.6-gcc5.4 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/linux 🚫 skipped
periodic-libtorch-linux-xenial-cuda11.1-py3.6-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/libtorch, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled 🚫 skipped
periodic-linux-xenial-cuda11.1-py3.6-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled 🚫 skipped
periodic-win-vs2019-cuda11.1-py3 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/scheduled, ciflow/win 🚫 skipped
puretorch-linux-xenial-py3.6-gcc5.4 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/linux 🚫 skipped

You can add a comment to the PR and tag @pytorchbot with the following commands:
# ciflow rerun, "ciflow/default" will always be added automatically
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun

# ciflow rerun with additional labels "-l <ciflow/label_name>", which is equivalent to adding these labels manually and trigger the rerun
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun -l ciflow/scheduled -l ciflow/slow

For more information, please take a look at the CI Flow Wiki.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Oct 7, 2021

🔗 Helpful links

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 1b31a6e (more details on the Dr. CI page):


💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

NivekT added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2021
ghstack-source-id: 3383454
Pull Request resolved: #66277
@NivekT NivekT requested review from VitalyFedyunin and ejguan and removed request for ejguan October 7, 2021 19:25
@NivekT NivekT added the module: data torch.utils.data label Oct 7, 2021
@NivekT NivekT requested a review from ejguan October 7, 2021 19:26
@NivekT NivekT changed the title [DataPipe] moving mux test to the right location [DataPipe] moving mux IterDataPipe test to the right location Oct 7, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@ejguan ejguan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great Catch! Thanks

…ion"


Previously, it is grouped together with tests related to `MapDataPipe`, but it should be with `IterDataPipe`.


cc @VitalyFedyunin ejguan @NivekT

[ghstack-poisoned]
NivekT added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2021
ghstack-source-id: 7849b2b
Pull Request resolved: #66277
@NivekT
Copy link
Contributor Author

NivekT commented Oct 7, 2021

@NivekT has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/nivekt/12/head branch October 12, 2021 14:18
@NivekT NivekT added the release notes: dataloader release notes category label Feb 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

module: data torch.utils.data release notes: dataloader release notes category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants