Adding custom device type change rules #69051
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
[ghstack-poisoned]
CI Flow Status⚛️ CI FlowRuleset - Version:
You can add a comment to the PR and tag @pytorchbot with the following commands: # ciflow rerun, "ciflow/default" will always be added automatically
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun
# ciflow rerun with additional labels "-l <ciflow/label_name>", which is equivalent to adding these labels manually and trigger the rerun
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun -l ciflow/scheduled -l ciflow/slowFor more information, please take a look at the CI Flow Wiki. |
This was referenced Nov 30, 2021
🔗 Helpful links
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 131ca77 (more details on the Dr. CI page): 💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚 This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. |
facebook-github-bot
added
the
oncall: jit
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
Krovatkin
approved these changes
Dec 22, 2021
| // building a registry for all of the custom Device Type rules | ||
| static const OperatorMap<PropRule> temp_registry{ | ||
| {"aten::cpu(Tensor self) -> Tensor", | ||
| setReturnstoDeviceRule(DeviceType::CPU)}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: shouldn't to in setReturnstoDeviceRule be capitalized as well?
| {"aten::to_mkldnn(Tensor self, ScalarType? dtype) -> Tensor", | ||
| setReturnstoDeviceRule(DeviceType::MKLDNN)}, | ||
| }; | ||
| device_prop_registry_ = |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this making a copy, otherwise we might get double free if we instantiate more than one DeviceTypePropagationPass since both will try to delete the same pointer?
Is there a reason we could store a reference to temp_registry or better yet just use it as a global singleton?
OperatorMap<PropRule>& device_prop_registry_;
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
[ghstack-poisoned]
|
@Gamrix has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stack from ghstack:
Differential Revision: D33555884