chore: CMCDv2 migration to CMCD Reporter#159
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @cotid-qualabs, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request modernizes the CMCD implementation by adopting the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is a significant and well-executed refactoring to migrate the CMCD implementation to use the official @svta/cml-cmcd CmcdReporter. This is a great improvement as it replaces a large amount of custom logic with a specialized, standard library, which should improve maintainability and correctness. The changes in CmcdController.js and CmcdModel.js are extensive but logical. The CmcdModel has been simplified and made more stateless, which is a good design choice.
I've found one potential issue where constructing a URL object from a relative path could cause an error. I've included a suggestion to fix this. Overall, this is a solid contribution.
| const url = new URL(request.url); | ||
| eventData.cmcdString = url.searchParams.get(CMCD_PARAM) || ''; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
new URL(request.url) will throw an error if request.url is a relative URL, which is often the case for media segment requests. This would cause the CMCD_DATA_GENERATED event to be missing the cmcdString. You should resolve the relative URL against a base URL, like the manifest URL, before parsing it.
const streamInfo = mediaPlayerModel.getStreamInfo();
const manifestUrl = streamInfo ? streamInfo.manifestInfo.url : null;
const fullUrl = new URL(request.url, manifestUrl);
eventData.cmcdString = fullUrl.searchParams.get(CMCD_PARAM) || '';
No description provided.