Skip to content

fixing benchmark versions #270

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 30, 2025
Merged

fixing benchmark versions #270

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
ab65c8b
fixing benchmark versions
javier Oct 30, 2025
50120ec
fixing benchmark versions
javier Oct 30, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion documentation/why-questdb.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ QuestDB, on maximal hardware, significantly outperforms peers:
alt="A chart showing high-cardinality ingestion performance of InfluxDB, TimescaleDB, and QuestDB"
src="images/benchmark/benchmark_all_q1_2024.webp"
width={650}
title="Benchmark results for QuestDB 7.3.10, InfluxDB 2.7.4 and Timescale 2.14.2"
title="Results for QuestDB 9.1.0, Timescale 2.22.1, InfluxDB 2.7.12, and Clickhouse 25.10.1.1486"
/>

However, on less robust hardware the difference is even more pronounced, as seen
Expand Down