-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
[QEff.Finetuning]CI enablement for Fine-Tuning #629
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
tests/finetune/test_finetune.py
Outdated
| return results, all_ref_metrices, all_config_spy | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| @pytest.mark.skip() # remove when it's clear why diff val_step_loss values are observed in diff runs on existing code (even without PR #478 changes) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tchawada Functional test, we should enable. Don't skip this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, I uncomment it.
| LOSS_ATOL = 2e-2 | ||
| METRIC_ATOL = 3e-2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How are these values decided? Earlier we had tried to sync them with Eager team.
| clean_up(alpaca_json_path) | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| @pytest.mark.skip() # remove when it's clear why diff val_step_loss values are observed in diff runs on existing code (even without PR #478 changes) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are still skipping this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We want to keep only functional test on CI. This test case is for our local testing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please specify this in the description of the PR.
Signed-off-by: Ann Kuruvilla <akuruvil@qti.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ann Kuruvilla <akuruvil@qti.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tanisha <tchawada@qti.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tanisha <tchawada@qti.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ann Kuruvilla <akuruvil@qti.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ann Kuruvilla <akuruvil@qti.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ann Kuruvilla <akuruvil@qti.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ann Kuruvilla <akuruvil@qti.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ann Kuruvilla <akuruvil@qti.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ann Kuruvilla <akuruvil@qti.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ann Kuruvilla <akuruvil@qti.qualcomm.com>
Split testcase into functional and loss assertion, and enable on CI
Reference metrics data is updated to latest.