`make-visible` not finding `unsaved-editor`

[shhyou]

Version: 8.15.0.7 [cs]

Related to: d27a480

Given this program in an unsaved editor:

#lang htdp/bsl


(check-expect 1 "no")

The source link at line 4, column 0 in the output does not highlight check-expect and does not bring up the current tab, unlike the case for a saved editor:

Welcome to DrRacket, version 8.15.0.7 [cs].
Language: htdp/bsl, with debugging; memory limit: 256 MB.
Ran 1 test.
0 tests passed.

Check failures:
        Actual value 1 differs from "no", the expected value.
at line 4, column 0
> 

It seems like this change to find-matching-tab works around the issue, but I don't know what's the right fix:

        (define/public (find-matching-tab filename)
          (define fn-path (if (string? filename)
                              (string->path filename)
                              filename))
          (for/or ([tab (in-list tabs)])
-           (define tab-filename (send (send tab get-defs) get-filename))
-           (and tab-filename
-                (pathname-equal? fn-path tab-filename)
-                tab)))
+           (cond
+             [(symbol? fn-path)
+              (and (or (send (send tab get-defs) port-name-matches? fn-path)
+                       (send (send tab get-ints) port-name-matches? fn-path))
+                   tab)]
+             [else
+              (define tab-filename (send (send tab get-defs) get-filename))
+              (and tab-filename
+                   (pathname-equal? fn-path tab-filename)
+                   tab)])))

from:

drracket/drracket/drracket/private/unit.rkt

Lines 3434 to 3442 in 8ffa804

	(define/public (find-matching-tab filename)
	(define fn-path (if (string? filename)
	(string->path filename)
	filename))
	(for/or ([tab (in-list tabs)])
	(define tab-filename (send (send tab get-defs) get-filename))
	(and tab-filename
	(pathname-equal? fn-path tab-filename)
	tab)))

[rfindler]

That kind of change is the right kind but it doesn't need the symbol? guard (you always just prefer port-name-matches? when it likes something) but I'm not sure it is the right change because I'm not sure how we're getting to find-matching-tab to know if find-matching-tab is supposed to accept only paths or supposed to also accept the names from ports.

[rfindler]

I see that make-visible, which calls find-matching-tab is already doing the port-matching thing, so that suggests that maybe moving something else might be a better solution.

[rfindler]

Yeah (and sorry for the multiple comments! I'll stop after this one to wait for a reply), it looks like this commit probably should have been done differently.

[shhyou]

Another attempt to just change make-visible in #708.

[rfindler]

Thank you!