Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request modifies several documentation pages by removing unnecessary Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant "Docs Page"
participant EmExample
participant CardComponent
participant TextComponent
participant EmComponent
User->>Docs Page: Open "em" documentation
Docs Page->>EmExample: Render <EmExample />
EmExample->>CardComponent: Build card layout
CardComponent->>TextComponent: Render text content
TextComponent->>EmComponent: Emphasize words
sequenceDiagram
participant Documentation
participant KeyboardShortcuts
participant KeyboardInteractionsTable
participant TableUI
Documentation->>KeyboardShortcuts: Request keyboard shortcuts
KeyboardShortcuts->>KeyboardInteractionsTable: Delegate rendering
KeyboardInteractionsTable->>TableUI: Construct table with data
TableUI-->>KeyboardInteractionsTable: Return rendered table
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
docs/app/docs/components/strong/docs/codeUsage.jsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.56.0 ESLint couldn't find the config "next/core-web-vitals" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct. The config "next/core-web-vitals" was referenced from the config file in "/docs/.eslintrc.json". If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. docs/app/docs/components/em/docs/EmExample.tsxOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.56.0 ESLint couldn't find the config "next/core-web-vitals" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct. The config "next/core-web-vitals" was referenced from the config file in "/docs/.eslintrc.json". If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. docs/app/docs/components/text/docs/codeUsage.jsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.56.0 ESLint couldn't find the config "next/core-web-vitals" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct. The config "next/core-web-vitals" was referenced from the config file in "/docs/.eslintrc.json". If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team.
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/app/docs/components/em/page.mdx (1)
7-9: Minor Punctuation Suggestion in Documentation Description
The description “Em is used to emphasize text.” is clear; however, consider a brief review for consistent punctuation if needed (e.g., ensuring uniform sentence style across docs).🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~9-~9: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... Em is used to emphasize text. `}> <Documentation.ComponentHe...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
docs/app/docs/components/strong/page.mdx (1)
10-10: Improved example clarity and formatting.The updated example better illustrates the intended use case of the
Strongcomponent by using a more contextual phrase and properly wrapping the content in a paragraph tag. This change is consistent with the update made in the correspondingcodeUsage.jsfile.Consider using a stronger word instead of "very important" to better demonstrate the component's purpose. The static analysis tool correctly points out that "very" is an overused intensifier.
-<p>This is a <Strong>very important</Strong> message.</p> +<p>This is a <Strong>critical</Strong> message.</p>🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~10-~10: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...00'>This is a very important message.
</div...(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (18)
docs/app/docs/components/avatar/page.mdx(1 hunks)docs/app/docs/components/blockquote/page.mdx(2 hunks)docs/app/docs/components/callout/page.mdx(0 hunks)docs/app/docs/components/code/page.mdx(1 hunks)docs/app/docs/components/em/docs/EmExample.tsx(1 hunks)docs/app/docs/components/em/docs/codeUsage.js(1 hunks)docs/app/docs/components/em/page.mdx(1 hunks)docs/app/docs/components/heading/page.mdx(1 hunks)docs/app/docs/components/progress/page.mdx(1 hunks)docs/app/docs/components/strong/docs/codeUsage.js(1 hunks)docs/app/docs/components/strong/page.mdx(1 hunks)docs/app/docs/components/switch/page.mdx(1 hunks)docs/app/docs/components/text/docs/codeUsage.js(1 hunks)docs/app/docs/components/text/page.mdx(1 hunks)docs/app/docs/components/tooltip/page.mdx(0 hunks)docs/components/layout/Documentation/Documentation.js(2 hunks)docs/components/layout/Documentation/helpers/DocsTable.js(1 hunks)docs/components/layout/Documentation/helpers/KeyboardInteractionsTable.js(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- docs/app/docs/components/tooltip/page.mdx
- docs/app/docs/components/callout/page.mdx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
docs/components/layout/Documentation/Documentation.js (2)
docs/components/layout/Documentation/helpers/KeyboardInteractionsTable.js (1)
KeyboardInteractionsTable(7-29)docs/app/docs/components/accordion/docs/codeUsage.js (2)
keyboardShortcuts(25-106)keyboardShortcuts(25-106)
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/app/docs/components/strong/page.mdx
[style] ~10-~10: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...00'>
This is a very important message.
</div...(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
docs/app/docs/components/em/page.mdx
[uncategorized] ~9-~9: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ... Em is used to emphasize text. `}> <Documentation.ComponentHe...
(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
🔇 Additional comments (15)
docs/app/docs/components/text/docs/codeUsage.js (1)
12-16: CSS Block Formatting Improvement
Moving the closing brace (}) up (removing extra empty lines) makes the CSS block more compact and improves code readability without altering functionality.docs/app/docs/components/heading/page.mdx (1)
21-23: Removed Redundant Wrapper for Documentation.Table
The removal of the extra<div>wrapper (previously withmax-w-screen-md) around the<Documentation.Table>component results in a cleaner DOM structure. Ensure that any necessary spacing or width constraints are now handled appropriately elsewhere in your styles or layout.docs/app/docs/components/text/page.mdx (1)
10-10: Updated Text Message
Replacing the original text with the inspirational quote "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." refreshes the content without affecting the underlying functionality.docs/app/docs/components/avatar/page.mdx (1)
21-23: Removed Redundant Wrapper for Documentation.Table
Eliminating the wrapping<div>around<Documentation.Table>simplifies the component structure. Verify that this change does not adversely affect the intended layout, especially regarding width constraints previously applied bymax-w-screen-md.docs/app/docs/components/em/page.mdx (2)
5-6: Import of EmExample Component
Adding the import of the new<EmExample />component clarifies the source of the example and encapsulates the emphasis logic, contributing to better maintainability.
10-11: Replaced Inline Example with EmExample Component
Using<EmExample />instead of inline JSX streamlines the file and centralizes example-related code in a dedicated component, improving reusability.docs/app/docs/components/progress/page.mdx (1)
21-21: Layout simplification: Removed unnecessary div wrapper.The removal of the extra
<div className="max-w-screen-md">wrapper around the table component creates a cleaner layout structure. This change aligns with best practices of avoiding unnecessary nested elements.docs/app/docs/components/strong/docs/codeUsage.js (1)
6-7: Improved example clarity and formatting.The updated example better illustrates the intended use case of the
Strongcomponent by using a more contextual phrase ("very important message") and properly wrapping the content in a paragraph tag.docs/app/docs/components/switch/page.mdx (1)
18-19: Layout simplification: Removed unnecessary div wrapper.The removal of the extra
<div className="max-w-screen-md">wrapper around the table component creates a cleaner layout structure. This change is consistent with the same pattern applied to other component documentation pages.docs/app/docs/components/blockquote/page.mdx (1)
22-23: Layout improvement: Better table positioningThe table has been repositioned after all component examples, creating a more logical flow for readers. This follows a consistent pattern in the documentation where examples are displayed first, followed by the technical details table.
Also applies to: 36-38
docs/app/docs/components/em/docs/EmExample.tsx (1)
1-16: Well-structured example componentThis new component is a good encapsulation of the Em usage examples. It provides a clear demonstration of the Em component in different contexts while maintaining consistent styling.
docs/components/layout/Documentation/Documentation.js (1)
11-11: Good refactoring to improve component reuseThe refactoring to use the dedicated
KeyboardInteractionsTablecomponent simplifies the code and improves maintainability. Using this specialized component instead of inline markup is a good practice.Also applies to: 69-69
docs/app/docs/components/code/page.mdx (1)
15-15: Consistent documentation layoutThis change aligns with the other documentation pages, improving consistency across the component documentation. The table now appears after the component examples, creating a better reading flow.
Also applies to: 19-20
docs/app/docs/components/em/docs/codeUsage.js (2)
1-4: Dynamic source code loading is an improvementThe implementation of
getSourceCodeFromPathto dynamically fetch example source code is a good practice as it ensures documentation remains in sync with the actual component implementation.
11-11: CSS implementation is incompleteThe CSS section currently only has a placeholder 'todo' string. Consider implementing the actual CSS example for completeness.
Is there a plan to complete the CSS implementation, or should it reference a specific CSS file like the JavaScript example does?
| {columns.map((column, idx) => ( | ||
| <Table.ColumnCellHeader key={idx}>{column.name}</Table.ColumnCellHeader> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Using array indices as React keys is not recommended
React documentation advises against using array indices as keys unless the list is static and won't be reordered, added to, or removed from. This can lead to performance issues and unexpected behavior if the data changes.
Consider using stable identifiers from your data:
- {columns.map((column, idx) => (
- <Table.ColumnCellHeader key={idx}>{column.name}</Table.ColumnCellHeader>
+ {columns.map((column, idx) => (
+ <Table.ColumnCellHeader key={column.id || `col-${idx}`}>{column.name}</Table.ColumnCellHeader>
- {data.map((row, idx) => (
- <Table.Row key={idx}>
+ {data.map((row, idx) => (
+ <Table.Row key={row.id || `row-${idx}`}>
- {columns.map((column, idx) => (
- <Table.Cell key={idx}>{row[column.id]}</Table.Cell>
+ {columns.map((column, idx) => (
+ <Table.Cell key={column.id || `cell-${idx}`}>{row[column.id]}</Table.Cell>Also applies to: 20-23
| const KeyboardInteractionsTable = ({ title = 'Keyboard Interactions', columns = [], data = [] }) => { | ||
| return <div className='my-10'> | ||
| <BookMarkLink id="keyboard-interactions"> <Heading as="h6" className="mb-4">{title}</Heading> </BookMarkLink> | ||
| <Table.Root> | ||
| <Table.Head> | ||
| <Table.Row> | ||
| {columns.map((column, idx) => ( | ||
| <Table.ColumnCellHeader key={idx}>{column.name}</Table.ColumnCellHeader> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </Table.Row> | ||
| </Table.Head> | ||
| <Table.Body> | ||
| {data.map((row, idx) => ( | ||
| <Table.Row key={idx}> | ||
| {columns.map((column, idx) => ( | ||
| <Table.Cell key={idx}>{row[column.id]}</Table.Cell> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </Table.Row> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </Table.Body> | ||
| </Table.Root> | ||
| </div> | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
New component closely resembles DocsTable with array index key issues
This new component has very similar structure to the DocsTable component with just a few differences:
- Different default title ('Keyboard Interactions' vs 'API Documentation')
- Additional margin class ('my-10')
- Different bookmark ID ('keyboard-interactions' vs 'api-documentation')
There are two concerns:
- Code duplication between this component and DocsTable
- Using array indices as React keys (same issue as in DocsTable)
Consider these improvements:
- Refactor to reuse DocsTable logic:
import DocsTable from './DocsTable';
const KeyboardInteractionsTable = ({
title = 'Keyboard Interactions',
columns = [],
data = []
}) => {
return (
<div className='my-10'>
<DocsTable
title={title}
columns={columns}
data={data}
bookmarkId="keyboard-interactions"
/>
</div>
);
};
export default KeyboardInteractionsTable;- Or if you prefer to keep them separate, fix the key issue:
- {columns.map((column, idx) => (
- <Table.ColumnCellHeader key={idx}>{column.name}</Table.ColumnCellHeader>
+ {columns.map((column, idx) => (
+ <Table.ColumnCellHeader key={column.id || `col-${idx}`}>{column.name}</Table.ColumnCellHeader>
- {data.map((row, idx) => (
- <Table.Row key={idx}>
+ {data.map((row, idx) => (
+ <Table.Row key={row.id || `row-${idx}`}>
- {columns.map((column, idx) => (
- <Table.Cell key={idx}>{row[column.id]}</Table.Cell>
+ {columns.map((column, idx) => (
+ <Table.Cell key={column.id || `cell-${idx}`}>{row[column.id]}</Table.Cell>
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
New Features