2025 07 18 any#372
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe "any" opcode implementation was replaced with a new version ( Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant TestSuite as LibOpAnyTest
participant LibOpAny as LibOpAny
participant Interpreter as InterpreterState
TestSuite->>LibOpAny: referenceFn(state, operand, inputs)
LibOpAny->>LibOpAny: Loop over StackItem[] inputs
LibOpAny-->>TestSuite: Return StackItem[] outputs
TestSuite->>Interpreter: Evaluate "any" opcode
Interpreter->>LibOpAny: run(state, operand, inputs)
LibOpAny-->>Interpreter: Return first non-zero input as StackItem
Interpreter-->>TestSuite: Return evaluation result
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Motivation
Solution
Checks
By submitting this for review, I'm confirming I've done the following:
Summary by CodeRabbit