bump int

[thedavidmeister]

Motivation

Solution

Checks

By submitting this for review, I'm confirming I've done the following:

• made this PR as small as possible
• unit-tested any new functionality
• linked any relevant issues or PRs
• included screenshots (if this involves a front-end change)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated internal dependencies to the latest version.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The subproject commit reference for lib/rain.interpreter.interface has been updated to a new commit hash. No other code or functionality changes are present in this update.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Subproject Commit Update lib/rain.interpreter.interface	Updated subproject commit reference to a new commit hash.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• bump int #319: Updates the subproject commit reference for lib/rain.interpreter.interface without code changes.
• bump int #323: Updates the subproject commit reference for lib/rain.interpreter.interface only.
• bump up rain.interpreter.interface #363: Updates the subproject commit reference for lib/rain.interpreter.interface without other changes.

Suggested reviewers

• findolor
• hardyjosh

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c096422 and 9b841dc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• lib/rain.interpreter.interface (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (3)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: thedavidmeister
PR: rainlanguage/rain.interpreter#360
File: src/lib/op/erc20/LibOpERC20Allowance.sol:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T11:31:28.010Z
Learning: In the rainlanguage/rain.interpreter project, forge (Foundry's formatting tool) handles code formatting automatically, so formatting-related suggestions are not actionable.

Learnt from: 0xgleb
PR: rainlanguage/rain.interpreter#333
File: .github/workflows/git-clean.yaml:4-7
Timestamp: 2025-06-07T11:15:44.415Z
Learning: In GitHub workflows for the rainlanguage/rain.interpreter repository, maintain consistency between workflow files when implementing concurrency controls. The user prefers using `${{ github.ref }}` over `${{ github.ref_name }}` for concurrency group naming to ensure consistency across all workflow files (git-clean.yaml and rainix.yaml).

Learnt from: thedavidmeister
PR: rainlanguage/rain.interpreter#360
File: src/lib/op/erc20/LibOpERC20Allowance.sol:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T11:31:35.645Z
Learning: In the rain.interpreter codebase, the team uses forge for automatic code formatting, so manual formatting suggestions are not needed as the tool will handle formatting automatically.

📚 Learning: in the rainlanguage/rain.interpreter project, forge (foundry's formatting tool) handles code formatt...

Learnt from: thedavidmeister
PR: rainlanguage/rain.interpreter#360
File: src/lib/op/erc20/LibOpERC20Allowance.sol:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T11:31:28.010Z
Learning: In the rainlanguage/rain.interpreter project, forge (Foundry's formatting tool) handles code formatting automatically, so formatting-related suggestions are not actionable.

Applied to files:

• lib/rain.interpreter.interface

📚 Learning: in the rain.interpreter codebase, the team uses forge for automatic code formatting, so manual forma...

Learnt from: thedavidmeister
PR: rainlanguage/rain.interpreter#360
File: src/lib/op/erc20/LibOpERC20Allowance.sol:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-15T11:31:35.645Z
Learning: In the rain.interpreter codebase, the team uses forge for automatic code formatting, so manual formatting suggestions are not needed as the tool will handle formatting automatically.

Applied to files:

• lib/rain.interpreter.interface

🔇 Additional comments (1)

lib/rain.interpreter.interface (1)

1-1: Confirm the submodule bump is intentional and compatible

Only the submodule pointer changed. Please double-check that:

1. git submodule update --init --recursive on a clean clone fetches the referenced commit without errors.
2. Down-stream contracts/imports expecting the previous interface version still compile against 6c04ffc… without breaking changes.

If everything compiles/links in CI, this is good to go. Otherwise pin the previous hash or bump consuming code in the same PR.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch 2025-08-01-int

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.