[REVIEW] Backport TLS files missing fix

[raydouglass]

This is just a backport of #320 to v0.14

[pentschev]

LGTM, thanks @raydouglass !

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@f6fe329). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 66.66%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #321   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   59.46%           
=========================================
  Files             ?       16           
  Lines             ?     1283           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?      763           
  Misses            ?      520           
  Partials          ?        0           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
dask_cuda/dask_cuda_worker.py	79.83% <66.66%> (ø)
dask_cuda/local_cuda_cluster.py	82.50% <0.00%> (ø)
dask_cuda/utils.py	88.23% <0.00%> (ø)
dask_cuda/device_host_file.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
dask_cuda/explicit_comms/comms.py	98.97% <0.00%> (ø)
dask_cuda/benchmarks/utils.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
dask_cuda/benchmarks/local_cupy_transpose_sum.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
dask_cuda/explicit_comms/__init__.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
dask_cuda/__init__.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
dask_cuda/benchmarks/local_cudf_merge.py	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 7 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f6fe329...a860a1b. Read the comment docs.

[jakirkham]

Thanks Ray! 😀

@pentschev, could you please take a look? 🙂

[pentschev]

I did approve it already @jakirkham . 😄

[jakirkham]

Ah sorry. 😞 On my phone and it doesn’t always show these things.

Thanks Peter 😀