Skip to content

Conversation

@suquark
Copy link
Member

@suquark suquark commented Mar 2, 2020

Why are these changes needed?

Related issue number

Closes #7376

Checks

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/22603/
Test PASSed.

if (self.proto < 5 or
(not obj.flags.c_contiguous and
not obj.flags.f_contiguous) or
(not obj.flags.c_contiguous and not obj.flags.f_contiguous) or
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@suquark are these fixes being upstreamed to cloudpickle?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There has been dramatic changes to the upstream (e.g. drop of python2 support). We definitely need to sync with them first. I'll create a PR later to sync with the upstream, then we could try to update changes to the upstream.

@pcmoritz pcmoritz merged commit 0792b5c into ray-project:master Mar 2, 2020
@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/Ray-PRB/22608/
Test FAILed.

ffbin pushed a commit to antgroup/ant-ray that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2020
@suquark suquark deleted the fix_pickle5 branch July 9, 2020 18:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Serialization of certain objects not handled correctly after 0.8.1

4 participants