Adjust expected test results for newer freetype versions#5979
Merged
greglandrum merged 1 commit intoJan 18, 2023
Conversation
there seems to be at least one larger change with freetype 2.11.1
DavidACosgrove
approved these changes
Jan 17, 2023
Collaborator
DavidACosgrove
left a comment
DavidACosgrove
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It feels a bit slack, but I guess it's less than 0.5% of the expected value. I don't imagine I eyeball things to that precision so it's going to pick up proper failures.
greglandrum
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 23, 2023
there seems to be at least one larger change with freetype 2.11.1
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I had a failing test after updating freetype to v2.11.1 on my linux box.
This should clear that up