Skip to content

Refine CWE→STIG mappings based on user feedback #16

@rdwj

Description

@rdwj

Track and refine the 126 CWE→STIG mappings as users report edge cases where:

  • A CWE maps to the wrong STIG finding
  • A CWE is missing that should be mapped
  • A confidence level is wrong (e.g., marked direct but should be inferred)
  • A finding classified as procedural is actually partially SAST-assessable

Process: collect feedback via issues tagged mapping-feedback, validate against the XCCDF finding text, update data/mappings/asd_stig_v6r3.yaml and data/mappings/finding_classifications.yaml.

The current 80/206 SAST/procedural split and 126 mappings across 60 CWEs are a solid starting point, but real-world scanner output will surface gaps.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions