Skip to content

Conversation

@li-jia-nan
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 28, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@li-jia-nan has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 33 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fca192c and 24d61f2.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .gitignore (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • src/DropdownMenu.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/Mentions.tsx (3 hunks)
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch clsx-update

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @li-jia-nan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on a performance optimization by swapping the classnames utility library for clsx. This change is intended to enhance application performance through a more efficient and lightweight solution for dynamically generating CSS class strings. The update involves adjusting project dependencies, refactoring relevant code, and making minor modifications to the build configuration.

Highlights

  • Dependency Migration: Replaced the classnames utility library with clsx in the project dependencies, aiming for improved performance and a smaller bundle size.
  • Code Refactoring: Updated all instances of classNames function calls to clsx within src/Mentions.tsx to align with the new dependency.
  • Build Configuration Update: Added pnpm-lock.yaml to the .gitignore file, indicating potential usage or acknowledgment of pnpm as a package manager.
  • Type Definition Adjustment: Modified development dependencies by removing @types/classnames and introducing @types/node.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@socket-security
Copy link

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Addedclsx@​2.1.11001009678100

View full report

@socket-security
Copy link

Warning

Review the following alerts detected in dependencies.

According to your organization's Security Policy, it is recommended to resolve "Warn" alerts. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Action Severity Alert  (click "▶" to expand/collapse)
Warn High
safer-buffer@2.1.2 has Obfuscated code.

Confidence: 0.94

Location: Package overview

From: ?npm/@rc-component/np@1.0.4npm/safer-buffer@2.1.2

ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What is obfuscated code?

Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support@socket.dev.

Suggestion: Packages should not obfuscate their code. Consider not using packages with obfuscated code.

Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/safer-buffer@2.1.2. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

View full report

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request replaces the classnames library with clsx for performance improvements, as clsx is a smaller and faster alternative. The changes are implemented correctly by updating package.json and replacing the usage in the components. I have one suggestion regarding the .gitignore file change to improve build reproducibility for the project.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 98.06%. Comparing base (fca192c) to head (24d61f2).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #300   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.06%   98.06%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         258      258           
  Branches       61       62    +1     
=======================================
  Hits          253      253           
  Misses          5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@li-jia-nan li-jia-nan merged commit d6bb17f into master Sep 28, 2025
8 checks passed
@li-jia-nan li-jia-nan deleted the clsx-update branch September 28, 2025 06:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants