refactor: placeholder move into the content #1167
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
Summary of ChangesHello @zombieJ, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the rendering of the placeholder text within the multiple select input component. By integrating the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 走查本次变更重构了多选组件中占位符的渲染方式，将其从独立组件改为 Overflow 组件的前缀属性，并调整了占位符的显示逻辑。同时更新了 Jest 配置、升级了依赖，以及修改了相关测试断言以匹配新的 DOM 结构。 变更
序列图sequenceDiagram
participant User as 用户交互
participant MC as MultipleContent
participant OF as Overflow
participant PH as Placeholder
rect rgb(200, 220, 255)
Note over MC,OF: 旧流程
User->>MC: 渲染多选
MC->>PH: 独立渲染 Placeholder
MC->>OF: 渲染 Overflow (无 prefix)
PH-->>MC: 返回占位符 DOM
end
rect rgb(220, 255, 220)
Note over MC,OF: 新流程
User->>MC: 渲染多选
alt 无显示值 && (无搜索值 || 未打开)
MC->>OF: 渲染 Overflow (prefix=Placeholder)
OF->>PH: 条件创建占位符
PH-->>OF: 返回占位符 DOM
else 有显示值或其他条件
MC->>OF: 渲染 Overflow (无 prefix)
end
end
代码审查工作量估计🎯 3 (中等) | ⏱️ ~25 分钟 变更涉及组件渲染逻辑重构和相关测试更新，需要理解新的占位符条件渲染模式、验证 Overflow prefix 集成的正确性，以及确认测试断言与新 DOM 结构相符。配置和依赖变更相对简单，但需核实其与功能变更的兼容性。 诗
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1167 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 99.49% 99.41% -0.09%
==========================================
Files 31 31
Lines 1191 1191
Branches 399 400 +1
==========================================
- Hits 1185 1184 -1
- Misses 6 7 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request refactors the placeholder logic for multiple select mode by moving the Placeholder component into the prefix prop of the Overflow component. This is a good structural improvement. The related changes in CSS, dependencies, and tests are all consistent with this refactoring. I have one suggestion to improve the separation of concerns by removing a redundant check, which will make the code easier to maintain.
| </> | ||
| <Overflow | ||
| prefixCls={`${prefixCls}-content`} | ||
| prefix={!displayValues.length && (!searchValue || !triggerOpen) ? <Placeholder /> : null} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The condition to render the Placeholder includes !displayValues.length. However, the Placeholder component itself already contains logic to return null if displayValues is not empty. This creates redundant logic and couples the components unnecessarily.
To improve separation of concerns, you can remove the !displayValues.length check from here and let the Placeholder component be solely responsible for determining its visibility based on displayValues.
| prefix={!displayValues.length && (!searchValue || !triggerOpen) ? <Placeholder /> : null} | |
| prefix={(!searchValue || !triggerOpen) ? <Placeholder /> : null} |
Summary by CodeRabbit
发布说明
Bug Fixes
Chores
Refactor