Skip to content

Conversation

@yoyo837
Copy link
Member

@yoyo837 yoyo837 commented Dec 1, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

发布说明

  • Chores
    • 更新虚拟列表库依赖至新版本,改进项目依赖管理和整体稳定性。
  • Tests
    • 同步并更新相关测试以匹配依赖变更,保持测试覆盖与一致性。

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 1, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
table Ready Ready Preview Comment Dec 1, 2025 8:53am

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

将虚拟列表依赖从 rc-virtual-list 迁移到 @rc-component/virtual-list,并在源代码与测试中更新相应的导入路径与注释。未修改公共接口或运行时逻辑,仅改变包引用与注释文本。

Changes

Cohort / File(s) 变更摘要
依赖变更
package.json
将依赖 rc-virtual-list 替换为 @rc-component/virtual-list(clsx 顺序微调,无功能性变化)
源码导入更新
src/VirtualTable/BodyGrid.tsx
更新 VirtualList 的导入来源为 @rc-component/virtual-list,并调整两处注释以反映新的包名
测试 Mock 更新
tests/Virtual.spec.tsx
将对虚拟列表的 mock 路径从 rc-virtual-list 改为 @rc-component/virtual-list,保留 WrapperVirtualList 的行为与接口

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • 改动集中且一致,主要为包路径替换与注释更新。
  • 复查要点:
    • 确认 package.json 依赖版本与 lock 文件(如存在)一致更新。
    • 验证测试中的 mock 恢复/包装行为与原先一致。
    • 检查构建/打包链是否需要同步调整导入别名或解析规则(若项目有自定义解析)。

Poem

🐰 旧径换新居,跳跃无惊扰,
导入轻轻改,注释也随到,
虚拟仍在舞,测试静静笑,
小兔庆迁移,代码梦正好。 🥕✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed PR标题清晰准确地反映了变更的主要内容:将虚拟列表依赖从rc-virtual-list迁移到@rc-component/virtual-list,这正是所有代码变更的核心目的。
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch bump-namespace-virtual-list

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b25b057 and d6f8b18.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: test / react component workflow
  • GitHub Check: Socket Security: Pull Request Alerts
  • GitHub Check: test / react component workflow

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @yoyo837, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request migrates the project from the rc-virtual-list package to @rc-component/virtual-list. This involves updating the package.json file to reflect the new dependency and modifying import statements in the affected files. The change ensures the project utilizes the updated virtual list component.

Highlights

  • Dependency Update: Migrates from rc-virtual-list to @rc-component/virtual-list.
  • Code Modification: Updates import statements in src/VirtualTable/BodyGrid.tsx and tests/Virtual.spec.tsx to reflect the new package.
  • Component Usage: Adjusts comments in src/VirtualTable/BodyGrid.tsx to align with the new component library.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly migrates the dependency from rc-virtual-list to @rc-component/virtual-list. The updates in package.json, component imports, and test mocks are consistent with this change. I have one minor suggestion to improve type safety in the test file. Otherwise, the changes are solid.

vi.mock('rc-virtual-list', async () => {
const RealVirtualList = ((await vi.importActual('rc-virtual-list')) as any).default;
vi.mock('@rc-component/virtual-list', async () => {
const RealVirtualList = ((await vi.importActual('@rc-component/virtual-list')) as any).default;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

To improve type safety and avoid using as any, you can use a dynamic import for the type with vi.importActual. This will provide proper typing for RealVirtualList and make the test mock more robust.

Suggested change
const RealVirtualList = ((await vi.importActual('@rc-component/virtual-list')) as any).default;
const { default: RealVirtualList } = await vi.importActual<typeof import('@rc-component/virtual-list')>('@rc-component/virtual-list');

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.09%. Comparing base (1c47315) to head (d6f8b18).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1423   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.09%   96.09%           
=======================================
  Files          57       57           
  Lines        3434     3434           
  Branches      632      632           
=======================================
  Hits         3300     3300           
  Misses        129      129           
  Partials        5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@socket-security
Copy link

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Added@​rc-component/​virtual-list@​1.0.1771009590100

View full report

@afc163 afc163 merged commit 38ba7e2 into master Dec 2, 2025
13 checks passed
@afc163 afc163 deleted the bump-namespace-virtual-list branch December 2, 2025 02:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants