clarify mountNode with comments #1521
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is still a bit opaque but it's difficult to fix with the current way CodeEditor works: - long-term CodeEditor.js could take a node reference instead of defining mountNode internally - could also use document.createElement to define the target in the code, but this could be mislead people to think this is required instead of using an existing reference see #1017, #1018, #1019
|
Deploy preview for reactjs ready! Built with commit 6f6fc8d |
|
I don't think this is very clear. Could even be more confusing than what we had. |
|
I'll do it |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is still a bit opaque but it's difficult to fix with the current way
CodeEditor works:
mountNode internally
but this could be mislead people to think this is required instead of
using an existing reference
see #1017, #1018, #1019