Skip to content

Conversation

@Sajjad21990
Copy link
Collaborator

@Sajjad21990 Sajjad21990 commented Sep 9, 2025

Description

Testing (ignore for documentation update)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Breaking change
  • Documentation update

Checklist:

Additional Notes:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a new long-form blog post on deepfake scams and cryptographic verification (zero-knowledge proofs).
    • Covers real-world incidents, detection limitations, and a “Verification before Trust” approach.
    • Explores proof-of-personhood, authorship proofs, and a user flow that produces verifiable attestations with a visible checkmark.
    • Includes a detailed case study of a large-scale scam and how verification could prevent it.
    • Published with metadata, images, and a GIF for better readability.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 9, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
reclaim-blog Ready Ready Preview Comment Sep 9, 2025 7:42am

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


Rohit Goswami seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Adds a new MDX blog post at content/posts/deepfake-check.mdx with front matter and a long-form article on deepfake scams and zero-knowledge proof-based verification, including scenarios, a conceptual Reclaim Protocol flow, and media assets.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
New blog post
content/posts/deepfake-check.mdx
Introduces a published MDX article with front matter (title, description, date 2025-09-08, tags, image, author) and detailed content on deepfakes, ZKPs, verification-before-trust, scenarios, and a conceptual pre-join flow; includes images/GIF references.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • LaithAlebrahim
  • Koushith

Poem

I thump my paws on verified ground,
No phony echoes, only truth’s sound.
A checkmark gleams, a carrot bright—
ZK whispers, “All’s alright.”
From seeing to proving, hop by hop,
This rabbit’s trust has a cryptic stop. 🥕✔️

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

  • Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
  • Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 475f14c and 55652d8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • content/posts/deepfake-check.mdx (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch rohit_blogs

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@Sajjad21990 Sajjad21990 merged commit a53507b into main Sep 9, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 9, 2025
10 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants