Skip to content

docs: add internal ebook links for SEO improvement#1836

Open
srushti-panara wants to merge 2 commits into
recodehive:mainfrom
srushti-panara:docs/internal-seo-links
Open

docs: add internal ebook links for SEO improvement#1836
srushti-panara wants to merge 2 commits into
recodehive:mainfrom
srushti-panara:docs/internal-seo-links

Conversation

@srushti-panara
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Added 5 contextual internal links to the /ebooks page from relevant blog posts and documentation pages to improve content discoverability and strengthen the website's internal linking structure for SEO.


Fixes #1815

Type of Change

  • New feature (e.g., new page, component, or functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • UI/UX improvement (design, layout, or styling updates)
  • Performance optimization (e.g., code splitting, caching)
  • Documentation update (README, contribution guidelines, etc.)
  • Other (please specify):

Changes Made

  • Added internal ebook links in the Google Icon Update blog.
  • Added internal ebook links in the GitHub Coding Agent blog.
  • Added internal ebook links in the GitHub CLI Agent blog.
  • Added internal ebook links in the Getting Started documentation.
  • Used descriptive and contextual anchor text for better user experience and SEO.

Dependencies

  • No new dependencies added.
  • No configuration changes required.

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project.
  • I have tested my changes across major browsers and devices
  • My changes do not generate new console warnings or errors .
  • I ran npm run build and attached screenshot(s) in this PR.
  • This is already assigned Issue to me, not an unassigned issue.

Build Verification

Successfully ran:
'npm run build'
and verified that the project builds without errors.

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel Bot commented Jun 2, 2026

@srushti-panara is attempting to deploy a commit to the recode Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Jun 2, 2026

Thank you for submitting your pull request! 🙌 We'll review it as soon as possible. The estimated time for response is 5–8 hrs.

In the meantime, please provide all necessary screenshots and make sure you run - npm build run , command and provide a screenshot, a video recording, or an image of the update you made below, which helps speed up the review and assignment. If you have questions, reach out to LinkedIn. Your contributions are highly appreciated!😊

Note: I maintain the repo issue every day twice at 8:00 AM IST and 9:00 PM IST. If your PR goes stale for more than one day, you can tag and comment on this same issue by tagging @sanjay-kv.

We are here to help you on this journey of open source. Consistent 20 contributions are eligible for sponsorship 💰

🎁 check our list of amazing people we sponsored so far: GitHub Sponsorship. ✨

📚Your perks for contribution to this community 👇🏻

  1. Get free Consultation use code recode50 to get free: Mentorship for free.

  2. Get the Ebook for free use code recode at checkout: Data Science cheatsheet for Beginners.

  3. Check out this weekly Newsletter: Sanjay's Newsletter.

If there are any specific instructions or feedback regarding your PR, we'll provide them here. Thanks again for your contribution! 😊

@github-actions github-actions Bot added in-review The current changes are in review and would need approval and testing before merging level 1 10 points recode this is label for leaderboard labels Jun 2, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the recode:launch 3.0 milestone Jun 2, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added Enhacement gssoc26 label enhancement New feature or request gssoc:approved gssoc label medium gssoc26 label type:docs gssoc label 5pts labels Jun 2, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Jun 2, 2026

✅ Synchronized metadata from Issue #1815:

  • Labels: enhancement, level 1, recode, Enhacement, medium, gssoc:approved, type:docs
  • Milestone: recode:launch 3.0

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Adez017 Adez017 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It feels like @sanjay-kv want to point that we need internal backlinks in the same good-icon-update page . this links are good but i don't feel help with SEO . let me correct if i am wrong @sanjay-kv

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
recode-website Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 3, 2026 9:30am

@sanjay-kv sanjay-kv moved this to In Progress in @recode-web Jun 3, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@sanjay-kv sanjay-kv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just as @Adez017 highlighted something you missed in context.

@srushti-panara
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks for the clarification. I understand the context now.

I initially interpreted the issue as adding internal links from different pages to improve discoverability of the ebook section. Based on the feedback, I understand that the requirement is to add contextual internal backlinks within the Google Icon Update page (and relevant content) pointing to the ebook/book resources.

I'll update the implementation accordingly and push the required changes.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

✅ Synchronized metadata from Issue #1815:

  • Labels: enhancement, level 1, recode, Enhacement, medium, gssoc:approved, type:docs
  • Milestone: recode:launch 3.0

@srushti-panara
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review and clarification.

I've updated the Google Icon Update article with contextual book-related internal links pointing to the ebook resources section. The repository currently serves these resources through the shared /ebooks page rather than separate routes for each book, so the links direct readers to the ebook collection where the referenced resources are available.

Please let me know if you'd prefer a different placement or linking approach.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Enhacement gssoc26 label enhancement New feature or request gssoc:approved gssoc label in-review The current changes are in review and would need approval and testing before merging level 1 10 points medium gssoc26 label recode this is label for leaderboard type:docs gssoc label 5pts

Projects

Status: In Progress

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add 5 internal links to high-ranking SEO book pages and guide contributors

3 participants