-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
Added missing tag in all templates-[role=_abstract] #243
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Hi @dubewarsagar, |
|
According to @jhradilek, we'll need that tag for migration. |
|
First of all, thank you @dubewarsagar for working on this and @IngridT1 for tagging me here.
I'll leave the review or the decision when you merge this on you before you do, I would recommend reviewing the language to ensure there is a clear distinction between the single paragraph intended to be used as a short description and the rest of the introduction for an assembly or a module. I don't want writers to think that they are limited to just one paragraph of text for the entire introduction, or that all paragraphs that follow will be used for the short description. I provided a more in-depth explanation of how this works in one of the issues reported to me. |
|
As @jhradilek just stated, we do need to re-add [role=_abstract] to the templates. I would recommend also changing the text in each template under the abstract tag to more explicitly state what goes in that short description. I'm happy to work with the appropriate people to change the language. For example, we could add the language from this DITA resource for each topic type. This is for a procedure:
-- |
|
@IngridT1 I agree the update to the template to update short description guidance is necessary. Should it be in this PR, or can we create another to contain that work? |
|
A new PR is fine, @neal-timpe |
This tag is currently missing in the templates.