Skip to content

docs: fix pool configuration grammar#3231

Merged
nkaradzhov merged 1 commit into
redis:masterfrom
Rohan5commit:docs/fix-pool-its-configuration-20260415
Apr 15, 2026
Merged

docs: fix pool configuration grammar#3231
nkaradzhov merged 1 commit into
redis:masterfrom
Rohan5commit:docs/fix-pool-its-configuration-20260415

Conversation

@Rohan5commit
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Rohan5commit Rohan5commit commented Apr 15, 2026

Summary

  • Change it's configuration to its configuration in the pool docs.

Related issue

  • N/A

Guideline alignment

  • Read the contribution guide where present and kept this to one focused text-only file change.
  • No behavior, test, fixture, changelog, or generated-file changes.

Validation

  • git diff --check
  • Not run: broader tests are unnecessary for this text-only change.

AI assistance

  • Prepared with Codex and reviewed before submission.

Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only grammar fix with no code or behavior changes, so risk is negligible.

Overview
Fixes a small grammar typo in docs/pool.md by changing “reusing it's configuration” to “reusing its configuration” in the pool creation example text.

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 1a6c034. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 15, 2026 02:26
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Fixes a grammatical error in the Redis client pool documentation by correcting the possessive form in a sentence describing pool creation from an existing client.

Changes:

  • Replace “it’s configuration” with the correct possessive “its configuration” in docs/pool.md.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@nkaradzhov nkaradzhov merged commit 56c619c into redis:master Apr 15, 2026
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants