Skip to content

auto-docs: Update property docs for tag v26.1.4#1666

Open
vbotbuildovich wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
update-property-docs-v26.1.4
Open

auto-docs: Update property docs for tag v26.1.4#1666
vbotbuildovich wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
update-property-docs-v26.1.4

Conversation

@vbotbuildovich
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR auto-generates updated Redpanda property documentation for v26.1.4.

@vbotbuildovich vbotbuildovich requested a review from a team as a code owner April 11, 2026 15:35
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 11, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: b621f70c-7e4e-4283-a603-4f71bb611304

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request updates version metadata and configuration property defaults from v26.1.2 to v26.1.4 across documentation and configuration files. Changes include: updating antora.yml fallback version attributes, adding property default value comparisons in a JSON metadata file, replacing placeholder "Maximum value" strings with numeric defaults (100000 and 10000) for two cluster properties in the properties reference file, and updating the corresponding AsciiDoc documentation to reflect these concrete default values.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • JakeSCahill
  • paulohtb6
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is incomplete and missing required sections from the template, including JIRA ticket reference, page previews, and category checks. Add the Resolves JIRA ticket link, review deadline, page preview links from Netlify deployment, and check the appropriate category (auto-generated updates appear to be maintenance/small fix).
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main change: updating property documentation for Redpanda tag v26.1.4.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch update-property-docs-v26.1.4

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify bot commented Apr 11, 2026

Deploy Preview for redpanda-docs-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 27e935b
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/redpanda-docs-preview/deploys/69dc02c8991dc6000875214b
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1666--redpanda-docs-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
modules/reference/partials/properties/cluster-properties.adoc (1)

13048-13068: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Default value note conflicts with the new default

The section now sets max_concurrent_producer_ids default to 100000 (Line 13068), but the note still says “default value is unlimited” (Line 13048). Please update the note so it matches the new default behavior.

Suggested doc fix
-IMPORTANT: The default value is unlimited, which can lead to unbounded memory growth and out-of-memory (OOM) crashes in production environments with heavy producer usage, especially when using transactions or idempotent producers. Set a reasonable limit in production deployments.
+IMPORTANT: A high value can lead to unbounded memory growth and out-of-memory (OOM) crashes in production environments with heavy producer usage, especially when using transactions or idempotent producers. Tune this limit for your deployment.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@modules/reference/partials/properties/cluster-properties.adoc` around lines
13048 - 13068, Update the paragraph that currently states “The default value is
unlimited” to reflect the new default of 100000 for the property
max_concurrent_producer_ids; specifically, change the note to say that the
default is 100000 (not unlimited) and keep the caution that a higher value can
cause unbounded memory growth and OOMs in heavy producer/transactional
workloads, advising operators to set a reasonable limit in production. Reference
the property name max_concurrent_producer_ids and ensure the surrounding text
and any conditional blocks (env-cloud/ifndef::env-cloud[]) remain consistent
with the new default description.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@modules/reference/attachments/redpanda-properties-v26.1.4.json`:
- Around line 9433-9435: Update the description string for the "Maximum number
of active producer sessions per shard" property (the JSON entry whose
description begins "Maximum number of active producer sessions per shard...") to
reflect the new default of 100000 instead of saying "The default value is
unlimited"; explicitly state the current default is 100000 and retain the
warning about memory growth/OOM and guidance to set a reasonable limit in
production. Ensure the updated description mentions the upgrade note about
23.2.x→23.3.x and the per-shard change remains accurate.

---

Outside diff comments:
In `@modules/reference/partials/properties/cluster-properties.adoc`:
- Around line 13048-13068: Update the paragraph that currently states “The
default value is unlimited” to reflect the new default of 100000 for the
property max_concurrent_producer_ids; specifically, change the note to say that
the default is 100000 (not unlimited) and keep the caution that a higher value
can cause unbounded memory growth and OOMs in heavy producer/transactional
workloads, advising operators to set a reasonable limit in production. Reference
the property name max_concurrent_producer_ids and ensure the surrounding text
and any conditional blocks (env-cloud/ifndef::env-cloud[]) remain consistent
with the new default description.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 432eeb04-5b23-46b2-9801-a170f5077fe9

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2c85927 and 6c7eb2f.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • antora.yml
  • docs-data/redpanda-property-changes-v26.1.2-to-v26.1.4.json
  • modules/reference/attachments/redpanda-properties-v26.1.4.json
  • modules/reference/partials/properties/cluster-properties.adoc

JakeSCahill and others added 2 commits April 12, 2026 21:32
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@JakeSCahill JakeSCahill requested a review from bharathv April 13, 2026 13:10
@JakeSCahill
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bharathv please confirm if these changes are correct. Do we want to call out this change in our release notes?

@bharathv
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bharathv please confirm if these changes are correct. Do we want to call out this change in our release notes?

lgtm. Yes this needs a call out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants