You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
However, it is more useful to interpret a spectrogram with the frequency axis (y-axis) having a logarithmic scale. But when I try the following, it loses resolution along the frequency axis. What gives?
Notice we have more detail as we go higher up the image.
However, this only looks good with plt.show() (aka. it opens in the browser). plt.savefig() does not have great resolution. And both these methods appear to take longer than using the chart API.
What would be the recommended approach for my use case?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello! Thank you for making an incredibly fast plotting library.
I want to use xy to plot large STFTs. I'm able to get a decent plot using the heatmap chart:
However, it is more useful to interpret a spectrogram with the frequency axis (y-axis) having a logarithmic scale. But when I try the following, it loses resolution along the frequency axis. What gives?
The matplotlib API gives me a result closer to what I'm aiming for. This is a port from the code I used to have:
Notice we have more detail as we go higher up the image.
However, this only looks good with plt.show() (aka. it opens in the browser). plt.savefig() does not have great resolution. And both these methods appear to take longer than using the chart API.
What would be the recommended approach for my use case?
All reactions