[feat] Allow custom HTTP headers with the httpjson log handler

[Lewih]

I tested this with ncat and a small config file as

site_configuration = {
    'logging': [
        {
        'handlers_perflog': [

            {
            'type': 'httpjson',
            'url': 'http://localhost:12345',
            'level': 'info',
            'extras': {
                'facility': 'reframe',
                'data-version': '1.0'
            },
            'debug': False,
            'extra_headers': {
               'ApiKey': 'test'
            }
            }
            ]
        }
    ]
}

Closes #2850.

Should we implement a test ?

[jenkins-cscs]

Can I test this patch?

[teojgo]

You would need to add this to the configuration schema as well.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 20.00% and project coverage change: -0.05 ⚠️

Comparison is base (2811360) 86.93% compared to head (20b67e6) 86.89%.

❗ Current head 20b67e6 differs from pull request most recent head dd29444. Consider uploading reports for the commit dd29444 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2854      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    86.93%   86.89%   -0.05%     
===========================================
  Files           60       60              
  Lines        11505    11500       -5     
===========================================
- Hits         10002     9993       -9     
- Misses        1503     1507       +4     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
reframe/core/logging.py	80.28% <20.00%> (-0.40%)	⬇️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[Lewih]

You would need to add this to the configuration schema as well.

gonna add it as "extra_headers": {"type": "object"},

[Lewih]

Documentation should be updated as well

[Lewih]

@teojgo , The PR now follows the community guidelines and the schema has been updated.

As far as I have seen, no test is included for extras and the others entries of httpjson handler. I would postpone a more complete test implementation for the handler in another PR.

[teojgo]

@teojgo , The PR now follows the community guidelines and the schema has been updated.

As far as I have seen, no test is included for extras and the others entries of httpjson handler. I would postpone a more complete test implementation for the handler in another PR.

@Lewih Thanks for the PR and the update. Yes, we don't have any testing for the handler at the moment but suggestions are always welcome.

[Lewih]

@Lewih Thanks for the PR and the update. Yes, we don't have any testing for the handler at the moment but suggestions are always welcome.

I opened an issue #2858 in order to track this.

[Lewih]

Synched with upstream branch in order to re-run the test to make sure nothing breaks, then PR should be able to merge.

[vkarak]

Lgtm; I just did a couple of minor style enhancements.

[vkarak]

We'll merge this after #2861 is addressed, which has broken our CI.