[test] Add HPX 1d stencil tests

[victorusu]

The stencil 4 check is a single-local test
The stencil 8 check is a multi-local test

[pep8speaks]

Hello @victorusu, Thank you for updating!

• In the file cscs-checks/libraries/hpx/hpx_stencil.py, following are the PEP8 issues :

Line 167:80: E501 line too long (81 > 79 characters)
Line 169:80: E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters)
Line 171:80: E501 line too long (80 > 79 characters)

Do see the ReFrame Coding Style Guide

Comment last updated on January 17, 2019 at 15:06 Hours UTC

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #617 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #617   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.62%   91.62%           
=======================================
  Files          72       72           
  Lines        9191     9191           
=======================================
  Hits         8421     8421           
  Misses        770      770

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7896a1e...bc9ec21. Read the comment docs.

[vkarak]

I think these two tests can be combined in a single parameterized test.

[victorusu]

@vkarak, we can combine both tests, but the combination is a bit ugly since both tests have different regexes for the sanity and performance. If you want I can make a base class that encompasses what is common between both tests and have different specialisations for both tests. What do you think?

[vkarak]

@victorusu I've now seen more carefully the test. You are right. They do seem quite similar, but in fact differ in several minor aspects. So leave them as is. Just fix the redundant imports and we can merge it.

[vkarak]

@teojgo Can you approve as well?

[vkarak]

@jenkins-cscs retry none

[vkarak]

@jenkins-cscs retry none