Skip to content

Conversation

@teojgo
Copy link
Contributor

@teojgo teojgo commented Feb 27, 2019

  • SlurmNode attributes are set to empty sets if they cannot be
    retrieved by the corresponding description.

  • Create abstract method get_all_nodes on the base Job class.

  • Remove method get_partition_nodes.

  • Create more unittests for flexible allocation.

Fixes #692

* `SlurmNode` attributes are set to empty sets if they cannot be
  retrieved by the corresponding description.

* Create abstract method `list_all_nodes` on the base `Job` class.

* Remove method `get_partition_nodes`.

* Create more unittests for flexible allocation.
@teojgo
Copy link
Contributor Author

teojgo commented Feb 27, 2019

@jenkins-cscs retry daint

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 1, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #693 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #693      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.89%   91.89%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files          77       77              
  Lines        9446     9452       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         8680     8686       +6     
  Misses        766      766
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
reframe/core/schedulers/slurm.py 59.71% <100%> (-0.29%) ⬇️
reframe/core/schedulers/__init__.py 94.19% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
unittests/test_launchers.py 91.86% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
reframe/core/schedulers/local.py 98.93% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
unittests/test_schedulers.py 97.67% <100%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
reframe/core/schedulers/pbs.py 66.66% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0ebaf49...30c1554. Read the comment docs.

@vkarak vkarak merged commit 0b21792 into reframe-hpc:master Mar 1, 2019
@teojgo teojgo deleted the bugfix/access_partition branch March 13, 2019 14:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants