-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 117
[test] Add CPU memory latency test #874
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@jenkins-cscs retry daint |
|
Should lower reference be smaller ? I need to retest this one: |
|
There seems to be an issue with |
jgphpc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
discussed offline
victorusu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #874 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.71% 91.71%
=======================================
Files 78 78
Lines 10339 10339
=======================================
Hits 9482 9482
Misses 857 857Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #874 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 91.66% 91.68% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 78 78
Lines 10350 10350
==========================================
+ Hits 9487 9489 +2
+ Misses 863 861 -2
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
'ault:intel', 'ault:amdvega' and 'tave:compute' are not in the ci |
vkarak
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @sebkelle1, nice work! I have a couple of suggestions for some side improvements.
|
@sebkelle1 Can you address my PR comments, so that we can merge this one? |
|
Hello @sebkelle1, Thank you for updating! Cheers! There are no PEP8 issues in this Pull Request!Do see the ReFrame Coding Style Guide Comment last updated at 2019-09-13 22:56:21 UTC |
|
@jenkins-cscs retry dom |
No description provided.